This introduction doesn’t mirror the assessments of the Defense Intelligence Agency or the U.S. Division of Defense.
Consider briefly the expressions of William Shakespeare who portrayed our dread of things to come in Hamlet. Hamlet discloses to us that it is smarter to endure the ills of the day than to head out to the Undiscovered Country. Visit :- ไลฟ์สดกลุ่มลับ
“The unseen country, from whose borne no explorer returns, confuses the will, and makes us preferably bear those ills we have over fly to others that we know not of” Hamlet isn’t communicating a dread not of passing on, but rather of not understanding what lay ahead. He was saying it is the future we dread. What’s more, in a world so described by tempestuous change, it is justifiable why so many are agitated by what’s to come. Chronicled accounts for the most part show the inclination among the general population was something similar in the Renaissance and in the Age of Enlightenment.
Today I might want to impart to you another vision of things to come. In this scene there are two kids playing in the sand. They are squabbling about how the sand mansion ought to be fabricated. Behind the scenes one can see a huge tsunami. It is 100 feet high and stretches as should be obvious. The thunder is stunning, but the youngsters keep contending, unaware of the coming future.
That is what the future resembles to me. We are in the start of a crucial rebuilding of human advancement and the vast majority of us are sleeping at the worst possible time or more regrettable yet, so occupied with our ordinary movement that we can’t see it coming.
I’d prefer to talk for a couple of moments about the future and how it affects knowledge and public safety. I think the most ideal approach to address this subject is in four sections:
1. What is the current climate of progress?
2. What does this Undiscovered Country resemble?
3. What is the future setting of National Security?, and
4. What knowledge abilities will we need for National Security?
We should discuss the current environment of progress first. A couple of years prior I was driving a Space Architecture Study for the National Security Space Office. The work should consider how space would work 20-25 years into what’s to come. Somebody remarked to me that nothing we do would change; that we had space abilities that we have been dealing with that long that actually have not been handled